Trade unions call for protections for migrants already living and working in the UK
Trade unions have intensified calls for the government to reconsider proposed changes to UK settlement rules that could significantly extend the time many migrants must wait before qualifying for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR).
The proposals, currently under government review, would increase the standard qualifying period for settlement from five years to ten years for most migrants. Additional restrictions could apply to certain visa categories, including health and social care workers, who may face considerably longer routes to permanent residence.
The plans have generated concern among employers, migrant communities, healthcare organisations and labour unions, particularly regarding their potential impact on individuals who moved to the UK under existing immigration expectations.
What Changes Are Being Proposed?

Under the government’s consultation proposals, the current five-year pathway to settlement could be replaced with a ten-year qualifying period for many migrants.
The suggested reforms may also introduce longer settlement routes for certain groups, including:
- Health and social care visa holders
- Migrants who have relied on specific forms of public support
- Individuals who do not meet future settlement eligibility criteria
If implemented, the changes would represent one of the most significant reforms to UK settlement policy in recent years.
Importantly, the proposals are expected to affect many migrants who are already living and working in the UK but have not yet obtained ILR.
Why Is Indefinite Leave to Remain Important?
Indefinite Leave to Remain allows eligible migrants to live, work and study in the UK without immigration restrictions.
ILR holders can generally:
- Remain in the UK permanently
- Work without sponsorship requirements
- Access eligible public services and benefits
- Progress towards British citizenship, subject to meeting nationality requirements
For many migrants, settlement is a key milestone that provides long-term security for themselves and their families.
Trade Unions Raise Concerns
Several trade unions have voiced strong opposition to the proposed reforms, arguing that extending settlement timelines could undermine confidence in the UK’s immigration system.
Union representatives have highlighted concerns that many migrant workers accepted employment opportunities in the UK based on existing immigration rules, including the expectation of qualifying for settlement after five years.
There is particular concern about the impact on overseas workers employed in essential sectors such as healthcare and social care, where international recruitment has played a significant role in addressing workforce shortages.
Union leaders argue that applying new settlement requirements retrospectively could create uncertainty for workers who have already made long-term commitments to living and working in the UK.
Impact on the Health and Social Care Sector
The healthcare sector could be among the most affected if the proposals move forward.
The NHS and social care providers have relied heavily on overseas recruitment in recent years to address staffing shortages across a range of occupations.
Industry representatives and professional bodies have warned that extending settlement pathways may make the UK less attractive to international workers compared with other countries offering clearer routes to permanent residence.
Employers are also monitoring developments closely, as changes to settlement rules may influence future recruitment and retention strategies.
Political Debate Continues
The proposals have prompted debate across Parliament and within the wider political landscape.
Some politicians have questioned whether migrants already living in the UK should be subject to new settlement requirements after entering the country under a different set of immigration rules.
The government has indicated that it is reviewing responses received during the consultation process and is considering how any future immigration reforms should be implemented.
Further announcements on the UK’s long-term migration framework are expected later this year.
What Happens Next?
At present, the proposed settlement reforms have not become law.
The government is reviewing consultation feedback and developing the next stage of its immigration policy agenda.
Until any legislative changes are formally introduced, existing settlement rules remain in force for eligible visa holders.
Migrants currently working towards settlement should continue to monitor official guidance and seek professional immigration advice where necessary, particularly if future policy changes could affect their eligibility timeline.
DavidsonMorris Guidance
The government’s settlement proposals have created significant uncertainty for employers and migrants alike. While no final decisions have yet been announced, businesses that sponsor overseas workers and individuals currently on the pathway to settlement should stay informed about upcoming immigration developments.
DavidsonMorris continues to monitor policy announcements and consultation outcomes. If you are concerned about how future settlement reforms may affect your immigration status, our specialist immigration advisers can help you understand your options and prepare for potential changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will the UK settlement qualifying period increase from five years to ten years?
The government is considering proposals that would increase the standard route to settlement from five years to ten years for many migrants. No final decision has yet been announced.
Will the changes affect people already living in the UK?
Current proposals suggest that some migrants already in the UK could be affected. However, the final details of any new rules have not yet been confirmed.
What is Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR)?
ILR grants permission to live, work and study in the UK without immigration restrictions and may provide a pathway to British citizenship.
Are the new settlement rules currently in force?
No. The proposals remain under consideration and existing settlement requirements continue to apply unless and until new legislation is introduced.
Why are trade unions opposing the changes?
Trade unions argue that extending settlement routes could create uncertainty for migrant workers, particularly those who entered the UK expecting to qualify for settlement after five years.
Read More Further ILR Related News:
UK: MPs to Debate Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) Petitions on September 8, 2025
Minister Confirms 10-Year ILR Plan but Stresses Consultation Will Shape Final Details
